A Note For The King: Radical Islamists Aren't "Radical" - They're The TRUE BELIEVERS

"All it takes for evil to triumph is for good men to do nothing..." Other than the Bible, were any truer words ever spoken?

I'm not saying King DingleBarry is a good man. His wanton and deliberate destruction of the nation I hold dear certainly bears that out, but the United States is still a good nation, and we are being prevented from ridding the world of this cancer called islam. Make no mistake about it - it is a cancer.
 
These so-called "radical" islamists are not - I repeat, not - radical. They are the devout muslims - it's the ones who don't commit violence against others, or have no interest in subjugating the world who are the radicals, despite what His Royal Lowness and others say.

 
ISIS, hamas, the taliban, book haram, and a whole host of others (all in lowercase to denote my profound disrespect) - they are following the fundamental teachings of their "prophet" mohammed. They are true believers, and the sooner people start to realize this, the sooner we can get about the demolishing of all they are, do, and stand for.

You needn't take my word for it, however - just listen to one who knows firsthand. ~ Hunter

 

Should The U.S. Be The World's Policeman?

I'm sitting here watching FNC's Bulls and Bears (I think), and I hear some twit asking if the U.S. really needs to be the world's policeman, specifically asking, "Do we need to be in Germany?"

As much as I agree with the sentiment that we shouldn't be the "world's policeman," one question comes to mind when I hear someone make that statement - If not the U.S., then who?

What other nation has the power projection? What other country has the track record we do? Russia? China? If those nation's project their power, it's only to invade and occupy, or "annex," like Crimea.

The United States has been, is now, and will be the only global force for good in history. We are the only ones who can do it, and people who believe that it's not in our national security interests to do so are dangerously naive.

It's one thing to stay out of other nation's internal affairs when one political ideology is squabbling with another ideology, but when an ideology's stated goal is the destruction of western ideals and they've been willing to put action behind those thoughts, as is the case with Islamic terror groups such as Al Qaeda and ISIS, then we are obligated, in my opinion, to take whatever actions are necessary to ensure our safety and the safety of our allies.

None of this means the U.S. needs to be involved in every brush war that pops up everywhere across the globe, nor does it mean we should be "nation building." It simply means that we can't hunker down, with our heads in the sand, and just wait for the problem to clear itself up, or worse yet, make its way to our shores before we act.

It's past time to stop worrying about what other nations think about the U.S. and start worrying about making sure we're safe. ~ Hunter