30 May 2015
The World Burns, Yet The Real Issue Is Ignored
Just in the last four days, twenty-eight people were murdered by islamist savages, including a teacher, as well as seven people doing nothing more than attending a wedding.
Between 16 MAY and 22 MAY there were:
53 jihad attacks
13 "allahu akbars"
1,095 dead bodies (that's 156 people per day, in case you were wondering)
423 critically injured
It's sadly hilarious that Christians are labeled as "intolerant" for merely speaking about their faith, but muslims actually kill, maim, rape, pillage, and destroy in the name of theirs. I'm not talking about "radical" islam. That's a politically correct term that disgusts me, and it should you, for if you've ever read the qu'ran, you'd know that newer verses supercede the older ones.
In other words, when islam is the minority, as it was in the early days of the qu'ran, they're peaceful, much like they are in the present day in countries they don't control. When they do gain the majority, however, they get more and more violent, as the later verses in their unholy book can attest. When it calls for "slaying the unbelievers," it basically overwrites those verses calling for peace with the infidels. Honestly, it's not really a hard concept to grasp.
The so-called "radicals" are actually the fundamentalists. They're following the words of their "prophet" to the letter.
In APR 2015 alone:
260 jihad attacks
26 countries
3822 "allahu akbars"
2,650 dead bodies (averaging just over 88 people murdered in the name of allah per day)
1,784 critically injured
While our president, good ole King DingleBarry himself, called attention to the Crusades at the National Prayer breakfast a few months ago, he remained suspiciously silent over the attack on the free speech event that Pamela Gellar held in Garland, Texas. The Constant Campaigner, the Petulant Pretender has, at best, only timidly denounces islamists for their present-day attacks while having to dredge up centuries old issues committed by people who were acting against the teachings of Christ.
If you have to dig that far into the past to find something comparable to present day events, it's not really much of a comparison, is it? ~ Hunter
11 May 2015
The Cowardice of Moral Equivalency
For all those cowards - and I do mean cowards - like Juan Williams, Greta Van Susteren, Geraldo Rivera, and Bill O'Reilly, who believe that Pamela Gellar is somehow "responsible" for two lunatics driving at least 1000 miles to attack an art exhibition and cartoon contest, I have one thing to say. Do try to keep up...
The show Gellar put on is not the same as falsely yelling "FIRE!!!" in a crowded theater, despite your clumsy attempts at conflating the two.
In the crowded theater scenario there is a reasonable expectation that people will be harmed as a result of an immediate panic in the theater. The person raising the false alarm is directly responsible for causing the panic and the harm.
In the United States, there is - and this is an important point - NO REASONABLE EXPECTATION that our words and/or expressions will incite someone to violence. You can protest that speech all you want with your own free speech, but the second you cross over into violence, you are the problem, not whatever it was that offended you.
Free speech is free speech. There are no qualifiers. It doesn't matter how offensive the words are, or who those words offend. If you don't understand this, if you don't support this, you couldn't care less about the freedoms upon which this nation was built. ~ Hunter