05 April 2014

Liberal Versus Conservative

There seems to be some confusion as to what the definitions of liberal and conservative actually are in today's world. Apparently some people need a refresher course.

Classic definition of liberal (A.K.A. classical liberal):
Liberal is "a person who favors a political philosophy of progress and reform and the protection of civil liberties" or "a person who favors an economic theory of laissez-faire and self-regulating markets," or "open-minded or tolerant, especially free of or not bound by traditional or conventional ideas, values, etc." or "favorable to or in accord with concepts of maximum individual freedom possible, especially as guaranteed by law and secured by governmental protection of civil liberties."

PRACTICAL definition of a liberal:
A liberal is someone who favors increased government spending, power, and control, as in Obamacare, as well as censorship of Christianity. Increasingly, liberals side with the homosexual agenda, including supporting homosexual "marriage". Many liberals favor a welfare state where people receive endless entitlements without working. Liberals are often anti-Christian, or otherwise disagree with moral or social principles held by many American Christians. They prefer atheism over the Christian faith, as atheism has no objective morality to hinder their big government plans. The liberal ideology has worsened over the years and degenerated into economically unsound views and intolerant ideology. Some liberals simply support, in knee-jerk fashion, the opposite of conservative principles without having any meaningful values of their own.

In practical usage, the term "liberal" is more closely synonymous with "radical," "immoral," "anti-freedom," “idiot,” or "bad."

PRACTICAL definition of a conservative:
see (classic definition of a liberal) "a person who favors a political philosophy of progress and reform and the protection of civil liberties" or "a person who favors an economic theory of laissez-faire and self-regulating markets," or "favorable to or in accord with concepts of maximum individual freedom possible, especially as guaranteed by law and secured by governmental protection of civil liberties."

These definitions alone are enough to explain why the so-called “party-switch” is an absolute fallacy. *Conservative* Republicans, wish to ensure the Constitution applied to ALL people, regardless of the accident of birth and skin color. *Liberal* Democrats, with their “liberal” interpretation of the Constitution, fought against equal rights every step of the way, only “politically” agreeing when they realized it was inevitable. They've never agreed to it in *practice* - just witness all their social programs, like Affirmative Action, etc. They're still into slavery. It's just not as obvious as it used to be.

If the Left would stop appropriating words and bastardizing their meanings, we wouldn't need to have posts like this. I know this is going to upset a great many supposed “liberals” out there, but facts are facts. ~ Hunter

 

No comments:

Post a Comment